JA GHI — EU Global Health Strategy Dashboard

JA GHI Slovenia – EU Global Health Strategy awareness survey dashboard, interactive

Overview — Slovenia
On this page you can find all the survey results for this country. Click on the filters button to see the data analysis for the specific topic, or on the All topics button to view all the charts.
View:
Respondents
0
Know the EU strategy
very well (20%)
0%
Support alignment national - EU strategy
0%
Want national strategy
0%
Favour wider dissemination
0%
Responding stakeholders
Government Ministries 2, Insurance and Commercial Interests 2, Professional Organization 1.
Awareness of the EU Global Health Strategy
Is your institution aware of the existence of the EU Global Health Strategy and of its content?
Yes, very well 20%, Yes, partially 80%.
Yes, well aware 20% Yes, only to an extent 80%
How respondents became aware of the EU strategy
How did your institution become aware of it?
EU channels 60%, other (media) 20%, several channels 20%.
National global health strategy in Slovenia
Are you aware of whether your country has a National Strategy for Global Health?
No 40%, don't know 60%.
No 40% Don't know 60%
Awareness of Slovenia's Global Health Ambassador
Are you aware if your country has a Global Health Ambassador?
No 40%, don't know 60%.
No 40% Don't know 60%
Target audiences for EU strategy communication
To which stakeholders should the communication on the EU Global Health Strategy be addressed?
Government/Ministries 50%, Civil society 25%, Other 25%.
Recommended communication channels
Which communication channels should be used to further disseminate information about the EU Global Health Strategy and its contents?
Social media 100%.
Coordination among key actors
Is there a formal or informal coordination mechanism among the actors holding major responsibilities for launching, financing, implementing Global Health initiatives/projects?
Formal 40%, informal 20%, no 20%, don't know 20%.
Yes, formal 40% Yes, informal 20% No 20% Don't know 20%

Key messages

This is a summary of the key messages emerging from the open-ended responses of the Slovenian stakeholders surveyed, organized by theme.

01

Need for alignment

National strategy EU strategy
  • In Slovenia, Global Health is currently addressed within the National Strategy for Foreign Policy rather than through a dedicated Global Health Strategy.
  • All respondents (100%) consider alignment between national and EU Global Health strategies important, recognising that shared health challenges require coordinated approaches for greater efficiency.
02

Communication and implementation

Disseminate, engage, implement
  • Communication must target a broad range of actors: the national Health Ministry, EU Parliament members, professional organizations, regulatory bodies, public health institutes, NGOs, and citizens.
  • Suggested channels include EU websites, academic and electronic publications, and social media (supported by 100% of respondents who agreed on dissemination needs).
  • Stakeholders can be engaged through Council Working Groups, expert networks in development cooperation, and multilateral platforms such as UN centres in New York, Geneva, Vienna, and Nairobi.
  • Respondents stressed the need for a dedicated national structure to coordinate the implementation of the Global Health Strategy and called for improved communication and alignment with Brussels and Geneva-based institutions.
03

National strategy

Embedded rather than dedicated
  • The majority of respondents are not aware of a dedicated National Strategy for Global Health: 40% say it does not exist, while 60% do not know.
  • Among those who answered "no" or "don't know", 80% believe it would be useful and important to have a National Strategy for Global Health.
  • The most relevant national initiative identified is the 2019 One Health Strategy to Combat AMR, coordinated by the Health Ministry.
04

National coordination and key actors

Who does what, and how they talk to each other
  • The main Global Health actors in Slovenia include the Health Ministry, the National Institute for Public Health, the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs, and the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia.
  • Coordination mechanisms are mixed: 40% formal, 20% informal, while 20% report no mechanism and 20% are unaware of any.
  • Where formal coordination exists, it is grounded in mandatory government adoption and formal agreement procedures.